Streaming Sucks
You probably already know that streaming sucks, at least anecdotally. But why does it actually suck? What happened? It seemed like the one business that would never fail - after all, everyone loves watching TV and movies. Having access to everything in one place for a cheap price, that sounds like heaven!
And it was, for awhile. We didn't know about the absolutely horrendous situation regarding residuals. Which, in hindsight, we should have seen coming. After all, if a big corporation can get away with not paying anything to the people that make their money, that's the ultimate goal of capitalism, right?
Even just five years ago, streaming was much easier, with only a few platforms dominating the market. Now, there are dozens and dozens of streaming services all competing against each other. Juggling their most popular shows and movies to make us pay for as many as possible without noticing, what a wonderful business practice.
This Streaming Service Hell ™ is only made worse by the fact it's practically the only way to possibly consume media. (That we're told of)
Which - in my opinion - is why 86% of people pay for more than one streaming service per month. That's from a Forbes article which I don't feel like linking back to because I hate Forbes, so here's my archived version of the article that doesn't support capitalists: Nearly 50% Of People Pay For Streaming Services They Don't Use
That article includes some other interesting statistics. For example, the average American pays $39 a month to line streaming corporations' pockets.
Now, I'm no genius, so I'm not judging these people, but the most baffling statistic to me would have to be this:
More than 50% of streamers have signed up for a streaming service with the intention of only watching one particular show.
That's insane, right? Batshit crazy. Can you imagine paying $10 - 15 per month for one show? I may be overusing italics here, but you can hear how that sounds, right?
There's also the issue of carbon footprint. Streaming services don't exist in a vaccuum, they rely on networks and infrastructure. The kind of big words that are usually not a good sign when preceeded by "massive".
There's this lady, Laura Marks. Seems like a cool gal. She's the Grant Strate University Professor in the School for the Contemporary Arts at Simon Fraser and also the co-author of the paper "Streaming Media's Environmental Impact". She seems qualified. Anyways, she says that these Monsters from Silicon Valley are "responsible for 3-4% of the global carbon footprint." (Monsters from Silicon Valley is the name of my new 8-bit indie horror game)
And then, of course, there's the issue I mentioned earlier: residuals. I'm not gonna go fully into it here, there's far too much to cover. You can do your own research if you want. But one of the biggest issues with streaming services is that they pay very little to the people that make their shows after the shows succeed. Pennies, basically. What's worse is that they don't disclose how they make those payment calculations, or the amount of views any media recieves. That means the people who make the media have no way to push back on the unfair pay, since it's basically a closed book. What a lovely and totally not ethically questionable business practice!
I'm not suggesting you give up your favourite shows. Not at all. But, you might consider a different method of consuming media. And I'm not talking about digital ownership (which doesn't exist, you're just purchasing a license to view that media on a platform, basically like a personal streaming service), because the only practical method of doing that is through Amazon, and that's its own can of worms.
I'm talkin' physical, baby.